The French and Indian War of 1754-1763 was the fourth and final struggle
for colonial dominance in North America. The long struggle for empire
in North America between France and England began with King William's
War (1689-97), followed by Queen Anne's War (17021713), King George's
War (1744-1748), and finally the French and Indian War During each
conflict, both the French and English enlisted Amerindian aid; however,
the strategic objectives within each alliance were usually quite
different. While the European powers warred over economics, trade, and
territory, Native Americans agreed to enter each conflict "based on what
they considered their best interests in protecting their territories,
maintaining trade, or settling old inter-tribal scores. Cultural impacts
on coalition warfare and differing strategic objectives among
Amerindians and the European powers are the focus of this paper.
Although the French and Indian War often found Europeans and Native
Americans fighting alongside one another, expectations regarding
strategic objectives, tactical objectives, and even concepts of
operations for campaigns varied greatly. While the European powers,
especially the French, recognized that different expectations and goals
existed within coalitions involving Amerindians, they did not fully
perceive the strategic implications that could result from the
uncontrolled actions of native partners.
OBTAIN DOCUMENT: Cultures in Conflict: As Assessment of Frontier Diplomacy during the French and Indian War
Search This Blog
Monday, November 18, 2013
The Illusion of Control: Great Powers Interacting with Tribal Societies and Weak Nation-States
Over the last 350 years, nation-states have interacted via international
norms and institutions that were nurtured under the principles of
Westphalian nation-statehood. In the aftermath of the Second World War
(1939–1945), the U.S.-led West created an international system based
upon the interactions of developed nation-states. New nation-states
formed in colonial lands when their European overseers departed. These
new nation-states tried to adhere to the Westphalian ideals, but many of
them were nation-state in name only. The controlling entities were not
the nationstate’s governing bodies; the controlling entities were the
tribal societies beneath the surface. Great powers have continued to
work with these hollow governments and/or tribal societies with little
to no success. In order to achieve positive policy results, great powers
must adjust their interactions and expectations when dealing with
tribal societies and/or weak nation-states.
OBTAIN DOCUMENT: The Illusion of Control: Great Powers Interacting with Tribal Societies and Weak Nation-States
OBTAIN DOCUMENT: The Illusion of Control: Great Powers Interacting with Tribal Societies and Weak Nation-States
Iroquois Confederacy's Experiences with Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces: A Historical Analysis
This book examines how the Iroquois Confederacy dealt with the
centrifugal and centripetal forces it experienced in its over 300 year
existence. Chapter one outlines an overall introduction to the subject.
It also shows how important both centrifugal and centripetal forces were
in influencing the Confederacy’s Center of Gravity (CoG). Chapter two
tells how both centrifugal and centripetal forces worked within the
Confederacy prior to the end of the French and Indian War (1763). Prior
to 1763, centripetal forces acted as the dominant forces. Chapter three
describes the changes that occurred between the two forces after 1763.
Chapter four provides conclusions that explain the changes in dominance
between the two forces.
OBTAIN DOCUMENT: Iroquois Confederacy's Experiences with Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces: A Historical Analysis
OBTAIN DOCUMENT: Iroquois Confederacy's Experiences with Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces: A Historical Analysis
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)